Generalising, this theory is applied to various stochastic processes concerned with geometric and incidence questions. Ī very celebrated case is the problem of Buffon's needle: drop a needle on a floor made of planks and calculate the probability the needle lies across a crack. The content of the theory is effectively that of invariant (smooth) measures on (preferably compact) homogeneous spaces of Lie groups and the evaluation of integrals of the differential forms. ![]() We can therefore say that integral geometry in this sense is the application of probability theory (as axiomatized by Kolmogorov) in the context of the Erlangen programme of Klein. (Note for example that the phrase 'random chord of a circle' can be used to construct some paradoxes-for example Bertrand's paradox.) If, as in this case, we can find a unique such invariant measure, then that solves the problem of formulating accurately what 'random line' means and expectations become integrals with respect to that measure. A probability measure is sought on this space, invariant under the symmetry group. There is a sample space of lines, one on which the affine group of the plane acts. Here the word 'random' must be interpreted as subject to correct symmetry considerations. It follows from the classic theorem of Crofton expressing the length of a plane curve as an expectation of the number of intersections with a random line. The early work of Luis Santaló and Wilhelm Blaschke was in this connection. Integral geometry as such first emerged as an attempt to refine certain statements of geometric probability theory. Such transformations often take the form of integral transforms such as the Radon transform and its generalizations. In more recent times, the meaning has been broadened to include a view of invariant (or equivariant) transformations from the space of functions on one geometrical space to the space of functions on another geometrical space. The best strategy is to assume easy until easy doesn’t work, always try the simplest techniques first, and remember there is more than one way to solve an integral.In mathematics, integral geometry is the theory of measures on a geometrical space invariant under the symmetry group of that space. In some cases, you need to use multiple techniques. If none of the above techniques work, you should take some more aggressive measures advanced algebraic manipulations, trig identities, integration by parts with no product (assume 1 as a multiplier).Radicals: use trig substitution if the integral contains sqrt(a^2+x^2) or sqrt(x^2-a^2), for (ax+b)^1/n try simple substitution.Product of a polynomial and a transcendental function: use Integration by parts. ![]() Rational functions: use partial fractions if the degree of the numerator is less than the degree of the denominator, otherwise use long division.If you can’t solve the integral using simplification or substitution, try to classify the integrand into one of the following: product of trig powers, rational functions, radicals, or a product of a polynomial and a transcendental function.Next, look for obvious substitution (a function whose derivative also occurs), one that will get you an integral that is easy to do.Not necessarily a simpler form but more a form that we know how to integrate. First, start by simplifying the integrand as much as possible (using simple algebraic manipulations or basic trigonometric identities).Let's start by sorting out the different techniques. Finding the "right" technique for a given integral can be difficult, it requires a strategy.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |